Expertise and Political Responsibility: the Columbia Shuttle Catastrophe
نویسنده
چکیده
One of the major conflicts between the principles of democratic politics and the practical reality of expertise in public decision making takes place in connection with responsibility. The basic principles of democracy include some notion of political responsibility, usually understood to take a bi-directional form, in which the relation between ruler and ruled takes the form of representation and the relation in which the ruled control the ruler takes the form of accountability. The means by which the people assure that the persons who politically represent them are responsible to them vary among ‘democratic’ regimes. Even within the general framework of representative liberal democracies the character of political responsibility varies considerably, both within a particular regime and between political regimes. Moreover, typically a modern state employs many devices apart from simple parliamentary representation, and very often these devices, such as juries, commissions, independent judges, law lords, and the like predate (or are based on models that predate) parliamentary government. Yet they involve their own notions of responsibility that resolve, ultimately, into a form of political responsibility.
منابع مشابه
When Is Shuttle Diplomacy Worth the Commute? Information Sharing through Mediation
We study the conflict mediation problem, sometimes called “shuttle diplomacy,” when the mediator acts as a go-between and must gather information from the disputants. In the context of a general model of information mediation, we show that the incentive that disputants have to lie to the mediator undoes any advantage that might be gained by adding communication with a third party. In fact, our ...
متن کاملHealth Reform Requires Policy Capacity
Among the many reasons that may limit the adoption of promising reform ideas, policy capacity is the least recognized. The concept itself is not widely understood. Although policy capacity is concerned with the gathering of information and the formulation of options for public action in the initial phases of policy consultation and development, it also touches on all stages of the policy proces...
متن کاملWhat System Safety Engineering Can Learn from the Columbia Accident
An accident investigation allows a view into an organization that is normally not possible. The strong system safety program established at NASA after the Apollo fire has evolved into a program in which the name remains but most of the important safety management and engineering functions have disappeared or are performed by contractors. The title remains, but the essence is gone. Many of the d...
متن کاملHayek and Socialism
I have received many helpful comments on this paper from participants at the History of Economics Society meetings at the University of British Columbia, at seminars given at the University of Georgia, at the Austrian Colloquium at New York University, at the York University-University of Toronto Workshop on the History of Economics, and at the Duke University History of Political Economy Works...
متن کاملAnalysis of the Impact of Conspiracy Illusion in Iran's Political Underdevelopment (Second Pahlavi Era)
the present research seeks to answer the fundamental question of how the belief in the plot of conspiracy as a cultural barrier to the achievement of the Iranian society of political development has worked. In this research, using the documentary, historical and analytical method, the sociological analysis of the influence of the belief in the plot of conspiracy in the failure of the Iranian so...
متن کامل